Critics imagine Singapore’s new ‘foreign interference law’ will further stifle free speech Critics of Singapore’s new foreign interference law are worrying about how the island-nation’s authorities may weaponise the model new Bill to stifle free speech. But the Singaporean government maintains that its new Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act “is wanted to prevent outside meddling within the city state’s domestic affairs”.
Singapore’s strict regulatory and licensing surroundings, sweeping censorship and libel laws, has pushed the country’s rankings within the annual International Freedom of Speech Index, all the way down to one hundred sixty out of one hundred eighty nations – behind Russia, Brunei and Uzbekistan, and a swathe of other third world international locations.
Here’s the complete list HERE.
One of the government’s 10 opposition MPs says the FICA shall be a “Trojan horse”, permitting the model new Bill for use as a blunt software towards free speech and dissenting views.

The Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act was put to the vote by the ruling People’s Action Party final week. The get together holds eighty three of ninety three of the country’s parliamentary seats. All supported the bill, pushing it through with an enormous majority. The authorities says the brand new law is necessary to counter potential incidents of “foreign interference”.
The new Bill can classify people, groups or NGOs as “politically significant persons” (or entities), and can embrace political parties and members of parliament. Anyone who desires to attraction being branded this way will, sooner or later, have to appeal on to the Home Affairs Ministry, as a substitute of the country’s courts.
Among the principles any “politically significant” person or entity must declare any “arrangements” with “foreign principals” or donations of 10,000 SGD (about 246,000 THB)) or extra.
There are additionally fines of 10,000 SGD or 14 years in jail for those who don’t declare their donations or allegiances. Entities could be fined up to 1 million SGD.
ติดตั้งโซล่าเซลล์ที่อยุ่อาศัย , the publisher of The Independent Singapore web site, which has 1.6 million unique visitors every month, says the new Bill has little clarity on the brand new powers of the Home Minister.
“Whether intentional or not, the federal government is organising barriers to entry within the media panorama in Singapore.”

Independent media outlets in Singapore have an embattled historical past with the country’s notoriously draconian strategy to controlling the political narrative, from native and abroad information providers.
Many foreign, and independent, news retailers have been prevented from setting up outlets in the island-state, regardless of larger international media organisations prepared to throw cash at the tasks to get started.
“Critics declare the Singaporean Government is making an attempt to “close off the web, and control or ban alternative or important voices.
Singapore’s media scene has been dominated by a near-duopoly for decades… Singapore Press Holdings, which publishes the government’s “cheer squad” daily national newspaper, The Straits Times, and Mediacorp, for the island’s tv and radio stations.
SPH is chaired by a former minister of the ruling get together..